Author: Constantin Măgdălina, Expert Trends and Emerging Technologies

In many organizations, the problem is not a lack of talent, but a lack of well-prepared successors. When a manager leaves, the external search begins. When a director burns out, there is no solid internal alternative. The company shifts into defensive mode. The pace slows down, decisions get postponed.

Most of the time, the reaction is to buy a leadership program. Large budgets, well-known providers, sophisticated modules. After six months, you have certified people, but not more real leaders. Leadership skills do not develop only through information. They develop through responsibility. Not only through theory, but through exposure to real stakes.

If you want capable successors, you must create real growth contexts inside the organization. Micro-mentoring, shadowing, and cross-functional projects do not require large budgets. They require clear intent and discipline. They build leaders at the rhythm of your business, not only in a training room.

The real problem, strong performers remain stuck in execution

Many organizations rely on employees with high operational competence. These people deliver consistently, meet deadlines, and solve complex operational problems. Their performance is valued. That is exactly why they remain in roles where their immediate efficiency produces visible results.

Here a common dysfunction appears. Companies reward operational excellence, but they do not create contexts for developing people who can step into coordination or leadership roles. Evaluation focuses on immediate results, not on the potential to assume future responsibilities. High performers remain trapped in an operational cycle, without access to experiences that would accelerate their leadership maturity.

The consequences become visible over time. The leadership bench shrinks. Strategic responsibility concentrates around a few senior leaders. When one of them leaves, the organization realizes there is no prepared second line ready to take over key responsibilities. The lack of successors is not an accident. It is the result of a system that protects people from complexity instead of gradually exposing them to it.

A simple question can diagnose the issue. How many second-line leaders have participated in discussions about the strategic impact of transformation decisions? If the answer is “very few,” the organization does not have a talent deficit. It has a development opportunity deficit.

Leaders do not appear spontaneously. They develop when they gain access to decisions, not only to tasks. The process requires deliberate design of exposure, responsibility, and learning through practice, supported by training programs and real experiences that build strategic judgment.

Micro-mentoring, real-time transfer of thinking

Traditional mentoring works poorly in dynamic organizations. Meetings are rare. Discussions stay general. Objectives remain unclear. Business dynamics move faster than these conversations, which makes expertise transfer slow and inconsistent.

Micro-mentoring shifts the approach. Instead of occasional interactions, it relies on short, recurring sessions anchored in real situations. A senior leader analyzes with a potential successor a concrete decision on the table, options, risks, financial implications, team impact. The focus is not the final answer, but the thinking process. How do you prioritize? How do you assess uncertainty? How do you conduct strategic analysis?

This type of exposure accelerates learning. Research shows that most leadership competencies are built through training, direct experience, and applied feedback. Observing how a leader approaches a real challenge provides formative value that no manual can replicate.

Implementation is fast and scalable. Select high-potential employees. Connect them with members of the management team. Schedule two sessions per month for four months. Each meeting starts from a current business situation, not a hypothetical scenario.

Results become visible within months. People ask more strategic questions. They anticipate risks. They think in terms of medium-term impact. These shifts signal leadership maturation.

Shadowing, the exposure to complexity and pressure

Many employees see only the final outcome of a decision. They receive a briefing or a new objective, without access to the underlying debate, real tensions, or necessary trade-offs. Shadowing creates transparency and accelerates learning. Future leaders join strategic meetings, negotiations, or sessions with key partners. They observe authentic interaction, not a filtered version.

After each experience, discuss what they observed. What decision seemed difficult? What would they approach differently? This reflection turns participation into development. A manager who attends a complex negotiation understands power dynamics, the importance of preparation, and the role of emotions in the process. Learning happens in a real context.

To avoid perceptions of favoritism, implement a rotation system. Each quarter, select two or three different employees to attend strategic meetings. Within a year, you build a broader group that understands the organization’s decision mechanisms. When a position opens, promotion no longer relies on intuition. It relies on real exposure and observed behavior.

Cross-functional projects, the real test of high potential

Leadership proves itself in action. Cross-functional projects become a critical tool for developing high-potential employees. They provide responsibility beyond the current comfort zone, within a controlled framework that allows accelerated learning.

A future leader can coordinate a product launch, process optimization, or system integration. The project must carry real stakes and clear performance indicators. If the impact is superficial, learning will also be superficial.

Top management must calibrate support carefully. Offer periodic feedback, but do not take back control. Let the person make decisions, manage conflict, and feel the pressure of deadlines and results.

Research on competence development shows that around 70% of learning comes from direct job experiences. Formal training remains essential. It complements the process, builds awareness, and refines behavior. Practical experience, however, builds real leadership capacity.

The infrastructure that builds leaders

Leadership development is not a budget issue. It is an organizational architecture issue. If strategic decision-making stays concentrated at the top and people are shielded from exposure, the lack of successors will persist. If you provide access to thinking, pressure, and responsibility, you create a steady flow of prepared leaders.

Micro-mentoring accelerates the transfer of strategic thinking. Shadowing offers visibility into real complexity. Complex projects test and develop leadership capacity.

Applied together, these tools build an internal development system aligned with your culture and transformation pace. Within six to twelve months, differences in behavior and ownership become visible. Training programs support the process, but you also need the courage to share power and the discipline to create real growth contexts. The future of the company depends on this step.

* * *

About Constantin Măgdălina

Constantin Măgdălina has 15 years of professional experience, during which he worked for multinational companies, both in the country and abroad. Constantin has a Master's degree in Marketing and Communication at the Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies. He is LeanSix Sigma and ITIL (IT Information Library®) certified, which facilitates a good understanding of processes and transformations within organizations. On the other hand, the certification obtained from the Chartered Institute of Marketing completes his business expertise. In the more than 4 years of activity within a Big 4 company, he initiated and coordinated studies that analyzed aspects related to the business environment in Romania. Among them are the economic growth forecasts of companies, knowledge management, the buying experience in the era of digital consumers, the use of mobile devices or the customer-centricity of companies in Romania. He is the author of numerous articles on topics related to innovation, streamlining business processes, digital transformation, emerging trends and technologies. He is invited as a speaker at numerous events and business conferences.